[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44CEBC6D.4040400@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:29:01 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
CC: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 built-in command line
Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 12:17:00AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> On Monday 31 July 2006 22:41, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> Andi Kleen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CMDLINE_BOOL
>>>>> + strlcpy(saved_command_line, CONFIG_CMDLINE, COMMAND_LINE_SIZE);
>>>>> +#endif
>>>> I think I would prefer a strcat.
>>>>
>>>> Also you should describe the exact behaviour (override/append) in Kconfig help.
>>>>
>>> In the i386 thread, Matt described having a firmware bootloader which
>>> passes bogus parameters. For that case, it would make sense to have a
>>> non-default CONFIG option to have override rather than conjoined (and I
>>> maintain that the built-in command line should be prepended.)
>> Is that boot loader common? What's its name?
>> If not I would prefer that he keeps the one liner patch to deal
>> with that private.
>>
>> For generic semantics strcat (or possible prepend) is probably better.
>
> No, it doesn't work for numerous kernel options that can't be negated.
>
How about we fix the real problem, then?
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists