linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [AIO] remove unused aio_run

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44CF7DDB.3070705@oracle.com>
Date:	Tue, 01 Aug 2006 09:14:19 -0700
From:	Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
To:	suparna@...ibm.com
CC:	linux-aio@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, mason@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [AIO] remove unused aio_run_iocbs()


> Chris Mason's aio pipe patches used these to reduce the large
> number of context switches he was observing when running pipetest.
> Of course aio pipe support hasn't been merged into mainline so far, and hence
> you could argue that we put these back in if/when we hit that problem.

Yeah, and that's trivial.

> But why
> not just put in a comment there for now to ease the confusion ... generally
> I'd rather go a little slow in removing apparently unused code at this
> point when we are churning things up again.

The only thing slower than not removing it after *years* of not being
used would be to never remove it :)

So I don't see any value in keeping it, but I won't make a fight of it
either.

- z
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/