[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44CFB8C4.8060904@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 13:25:40 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: vgoyal@...ibm.com
CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, fastboot@...l.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Horms <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Jan Kratochvil <lace@...kratochvil.net>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Linda Wang <lwang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] ELF Relocatable x86 and x86_64 bzImages
Vivek Goyal wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> Can't we use the x86_64 relocation approach for i386 as well? I mean keep
> the virtual address space fixed and updating the page tables. This would
> help in the sense that you don't have to change gdb if somebody decides to
> debug the relocated kernel.
>
> Any such tool that retrieves the symbol virtual address from vmlinux will
> be confused.
>
I don't think this is practical given the virtual space constraints on
i386 systems.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists