[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060801140707.a55a0513.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 14:07:07 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix vmstat per cpu usage
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 19:36:21 +0200
Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de> wrote:
> The per cpu variables are used incorrectly in vmstat.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
> ---
> include/linux/vmstat.h | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-v2.6.18-rc3/include/linux/vmstat.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-v2.6.18-rc3.orig/include/linux/vmstat.h
> +++ linux-v2.6.18-rc3/include/linux/vmstat.h
> @@ -41,23 +41,23 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct vm_event_state, v
>
> static inline void __count_vm_event(enum vm_event_item item)
> {
> - __get_cpu_var(vm_event_states.event[item])++;
> + __get_cpu_var(vm_event_states).event[item]++;
> }
How odd. Are there any negative consequences to the existing code?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists