[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060802091841.8585a72a.khali@linux-fr.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 09:18:41 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Cc: Shem Multinymous <multinymous@...il.com>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-thinkpad@...ux-thinkpad.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@...ian.org>,
Mark Underwood <basicmark@...oo.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: Generic battery interface
Hi Pavel,
> > frequently it can read from the chip. And no hardware monitoring chip I
> > know of can tell when the monitored value has changed - you have to read
> > the chip registers to know.
>
> ACPI battery can tell when values change in significant way. (Like
> battery becoming critical).
Ah, good to know. But is there a practical use for this? I'd suspect
that the user wants to know the battery charge% all the time anyway,
critical or not.
--
Jean Delvare
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists