linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Proposal: common kernel-wide GPIO interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060802175834.GA13641@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date:	Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:58:34 -0400
From:	Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca>
To:	Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
Cc:	Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@...gutronix.de>,
	Chris Boot <bootc@...tc.net>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposal: common kernel-wide GPIO interface

On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 03:25:32PM -0600, Jim Cromie wrote:
> this is cool to see.  Using a class-driver is very different from the 
> vtable-approach
> that I used (struct nsc_gpio_ops) in pc8736x_gpio and scx200_gpio.
> 
> Are any of the limitation youve cited above related to the 
> /sys/class/gpio paths below ?
> 
> +	  To set pin 63 to low (to start the motor) do a:
> +	   $ echo 0 > /sys/class/gpio/gpio63/level
> +	  Or to stop the motor again:
> +	   $ echo 1 > /sys/class/gpio/gpio63/level
> +	  To get the level of the key (pin 8) do:
> +	   $ cat /sys/class/gpio/gpio8/level
> +	  The result will be 1 or 0.
> +
> +	  To add new GPIO pins at runtime (lets say pin 88 should be an 
> input)
> +	  you can do a:
> +	   $ echo 88:in > /sys/class/gpio/map_gpio
> +	  The same with a new GPIO pin 95, it should be an output and at 
> high level:
> +	   $ echo 95:out:hi > /sys/class/gpio/map_gpio
> +

How do you deal with having multiple places that provide GPIOs then?  I
may have 8 pins on a PCI UART chip, 22 on my super io chip, 16 on my
cpu, etc.  How would this be mapped if you only have one map_gpio
method?  It is much simpler to code for knowing pin 0 to 7 of device
uartgpio is where my UART pins are, and some other device has 22 pins
for the super io chip.  If they all ended up in one place with
consequative numbers it would be a real pain.  

Sometimes it is also nice to be able to control multiple pins as a block,
which only a few gpio interfaces seem to provide (they all seem to think
they should only be moved one pin at a time, which makes for a lot more
system calls to get things done).

Right now I am working on adding some stuff to the jsm driver to use an
Exar uart along with using the gpios, and so far I added gpio access
similar to how scx200_gpio does things, using minors 0 to 7 for the 8
pins on the first uart, 8 to 15 for the second, and so on.  What to name
the /dev entries is a different issue.  I can identify which device to
look for based on the /sys info for which pci slot the uart is connected
to.  I am not sure how this would tie into a generic gpio design.

Does your gpio design deal with all the things gpios often do:
input/output/tristate
high/low
generate interrupt
edge/level trigger
high or low level/leading or trailing edge trigger

--
Len Sorensen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/