linux-kernel - Re: [bug] e100: checksum mismatch on 82551ER rev10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44D0EF56.9020905@intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:30:46 -0700
From:	Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To:	Charlie Brady <charlieb@...ge.apana.org.au>
CC:	Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
	NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	molle.bestefich@...il.com
Subject: Re: [bug] e100: checksum mismatch on 82551ER rev10

Charlie Brady wrote:
>>> Let's assume that these things are all true, and the NIC currently 
>>> does not work perfectly, just imperfectly, but acceptably. With the 
>>> recent driver change, it now does not work at all. That's surely a 
>>> bug in the driver.
>>
>> There is no logic in that sentence at all. You're saying that the 
>> driver is broken because it doesn't fix an error in the EEPROM?
> 
> I am not asking the driver to fix errors in the EEPROM. I'm asking it to 
> send and receive packets, as it has done in the past.

maybe you are confusing e100 with eepro100. e100 has done this since it made 
it into 2.6.4 or so.

Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/