[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060802191054.GA6825@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 23:10:54 +0400
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs.h: ifdef security fields
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 12:53:05PM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 19:14 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > > > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> > > > @@ -552,7 +552,9 @@ struct inode {
> > > > unsigned int i_flags;
> > > >
> > > > atomic_t i_writecount;
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
> > > > void *i_security;
> > > > +#endif
> > > > union {
> > > > void *generic_ip;
> > > > } u;
> > > > @@ -688,8 +690,9 @@ struct file {
> > > > struct file_ra_state f_ra;
> > > >
> > > > unsigned long f_version;
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX
> > >
> > > This should just be CONFIG_SECURITY.
> >
> > After another user appear.
>
> I see. Well, if that's the rationale, I thought that seclvl was also
> scheduled for removal in 2.6.18 with the agreement of its maintainer, so
> that would also apply to i_security.
OK, I see seclvl removal patch has been sent and have found couple more
highly greppable fields: "security". :-) There will be bigger patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists