[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060802195107.GB8124@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 21:51:07 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
Shem Multinymous <multinymous@...il.com>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, vojtech@...e.cz,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-thinkpad@...ux-thinkpad.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Generic battery interface
Hi!
> > Actually I do not see "hwmon infrastructure" to exist. Every driver
> > just uses sysfs directly. I'm not sure that the best option --
> > "input-like" infrastructure can make drivers even shorter -- but
> > perhaps just directly using sysfs is best for simple task like a battery?
> >
> > Jean, any ideas?
>
> I guess we never felt any need for an "infrastructure", else we would
> have created it. I have no idea what the "input infrastructure" looks
> like so I can't compare. If you have something to propose which would
> refactor some code amongst the hardware monitoring drivers or would
> otherwise makes thing better, speak up :)
I'm not sure if it is practical for hwmon, but having
report_voltage(x,y) is probably easier than coding sysfs stuff by
hand.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists