linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Aug 2006 14:36:11 -0700
From:	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc:	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
	nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, vatsa@...ibm.com, Simon.Derr@...l.net,
	steiner@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] sched: big numa dynamic sched domain memory corruption

On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 11:57:52PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Suresh wrote:
> > Basically SLES10 has to backport all these patches:
> > 
> > sched: fix group power for allnodes_domains
> > sched_domai: Allocate sched_group structures dynamically
> > sched: build_sched_domains() fix
> 
> 
> A few questions on this, centered around the question of which dynamic
> sched domain patches we should backport to SLES10.
> 
> Readers not seriously interested in sched domains on 2.6.16.* kernels
> will probably want to ignore this post.

Paul, I will answer your questions on Suse bugzilla as that is a better
forum than lkml.

thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/