linux-kernel - Re: make 16C950 UARTs work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 02 Aug 2006 23:08:56 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rmk@....linux.org.uk,
	Mathias Adam <a2@...mis.de>
Subject: Re: make 16C950 UARTs work

Ar Mer, 2006-08-02 am 15:49 -0400, ysgrifennodd Dave Jones:
> This patch has been submitted a number of times, and doesn't seem
> to get any upstream traction, which is a shame, as it seems to work
> for users, and I keep inadvertantly dropping it from the Fedora
> kernel everytime I rebase it.

We really ought to do that based on the PCI subvendor/subdevice id of
the boards in use if possible surely ? It ought to be safe for x86
because nobody is going to use anything but chip default values so they
can avoid needing a ROM.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/