[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200608020800.22802.eike-kernel@sf-tec.de>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:00:22 +0200
From: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc: arjan@...radead.org, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: deprecate and convert some sleep_on variants.
Am Dienstag, 1. August 2006 20:06 schrieb Dave Jones:
> We've been carrying this for a dogs age in Fedora. It'd be good to get
> this in -mm, so that it stands some chance of getting upstreamed at some
> point.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
>
> diff -urNp --exclude-from=/home/davej/.exclude
> linux-1060/drivers/block/DAC960.c linux-1070/drivers/block/DAC960.c ---
> linux-1060/drivers/block/DAC960.c
> +++ linux-1070/drivers/block/DAC960.c
> @@ -6132,6 +6132,9 @@ static boolean DAC960_V2_ExecuteUserComm
> unsigned long flags;
> unsigned char Channel, TargetID, LogicalDriveNumber;
> unsigned short LogicalDeviceNumber;
> + wait_queue_t __wait;
> +
> + init_waitqueue_entry(&__wait, current);
Is this only my opinion or is this really a bad choice for the queues name?
Eike
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists