| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0608020818010.7593@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 08:22:02 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de> To: "Scott J. Harmon" <harmon@....edu> cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Hans Reiser <reiser@...esys.com>, Denis Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: reiser4: maybe just fix bugs? >> fsck.ext2/fsck.vfat/... follow some convention including naming, >> command line switches, and behaviour. >> >> Like fsck.ext2 /dev/something is enough to check the fielsystem. > > >> reiserfsck is missnamed (should be fsck.reiser), and it likes to chat >> with you -- which is unexpected for tools. > >Yeah, I would never imagine that for ext2 and ext3 fsck might be called >'e2fsck'. ;-) So everyone plays his game... xfs_check jfs_fsck dosfsck I don't see why reiserfsck should be out of line... Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists