[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44D20079.2000601@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:56:09 -0400
From: Shailabh Nagar <nagar@...son.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
CC: Jay Lan <jlan@...r.sgi.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
balbir@...ibm.com, jes@....com, csturtiv@....com, tee@....com,
guillaume.thouvenin@...l.net
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] basic accounting over taskstats
Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> Or we remove this field altogether, perhaps. The same info is available
> from /proc/pid/stat anyway. Is it really needed?
>
Gathering this data in userspace from /proc might be
difficult esp. for short-lived tasks.
Also, /proc may not be mounted ? I'd heard somewhere that
some sysadmins don't install /proc for security reasons.
Don't know how far thats true.
Several other fields, totalling 58 bytes, added by the CSA
patches are also duplicated in /proc/pid/stat. But all of them
could change in value during the lifetime of a task so I'm
guessing its not useful to get them from /proc
even if some kind of userspace polling of the value was
possible.
But if there is a way, it would sure save a lot of payload
sent over taskstats !
"duplicate" fields from CSA:
+ __u8 ac_nice; /* task_nice */
+ char ac_comm[TS_COMM_LEN]; /* Command name */
+ __u8 ac_sched; /* Scheduling discipline */
+ __u32 ac_pid; /* Process ID */
+ __u32 ac_ppid; /* Parent process ID */
+ __u64 ac_utime; /* User CPU time [usec] */
+ __u64 ac_stime; /* SYstem CPU time [usec] */
+ __u64 ac_minflt; /* Minor Page Fault */
+ __u64 ac_majflt; /* Major Page Fault */
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists