linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/33] i386: CONFIG_PHYSICAL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060803140512.GA9815@mars.ravnborg.org>
Date:	Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:05:12 +0200
From:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	fastboot@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Horms <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	Jan Kratochvil <lace@...kratochvil.net>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>, Linda Wang <lwang@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/33] i386: CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START cleanup

> 
> Stupid questions:
> - Why do we still have a linux/config.h if it is totally redundant.
> - Why don't we have at least a #warning in linux/config.h that would
>   tell us not to include it.
> - Why do we still have about 200 includes of linux/config.h in the
>   kernel tree?
> 
> I would much rather have a compile error, or at least a compile
> warning rather than needed a code review to notice this error.
In progress. As part of the ongoing header cleanup all include
<config.h> are being removed and a warning is included in config.h.

When the change was done I did not want to spew out thousands of warning
for a simple thing like this.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/