linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/28] r/o bind mount prepwork: move open_namei()'s vfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060803143317.GB920@infradead.org>
Date:	Thu, 3 Aug 2006 15:33:17 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@....linux.org.uk,
	herbert@...hfloor.at, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/28] r/o bind mount prepwork: move open_namei()'s vfs_create()

On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 04:52:41PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
> The code around vfs_create() in open_namei() is getting a
> bit too complex.  Right now, there is at least the reference
> count on the dentry, and the i_mutex to worry about.  Soon,
> we'll also have mnt_writecount.
> 
> So, break the vfs_create() call out of open_namei(), and
> into a helper function.  This duplicates the call to
> may_open(), but that isn't such a bad thing since the
> arguments (acc_mode and flag) were being heavily massaged
> anyway.
> 
> Later in the series, we'll add the mnt_writecount handling
> around this new function call.
> 

Ok.  Again please send to Andrew ASAP.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/