[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060803154125.GA9745@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 19:41:26 +0400
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To: Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@....pl>
Cc: Arnd Hannemann <arnd@...dnet.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: problems with e1000 and jumboframes
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 07:16:31PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov (johnpol@....mipt.ru) wrote:
> > >then skb_alloc adds a little
> > >(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)) at the end, and this ends up
> > >in 32k request just for 9k jumbo frame.
> >
> > Strange, why this skb_shared_info cannon be added before first alignment?
> > And what about smaller frames like 1500, does this driver behave similar
> > (first align then add)?
>
> It can be.
> Could attached (completely untested) patch help?
Actually this patch will not help, this new one could.
diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
index da62db8..1514628 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
@@ -3978,9 +3978,11 @@ e1000_alloc_rx_buffers(struct e1000_adap
buffer_info = &rx_ring->buffer_info[i];
while (cleaned_count--) {
- if (!(skb = buffer_info->skb))
+ if (!(skb = buffer_info->skb)) {
+ if (SKB_DATA_ALIGN(adapter->hw.max_frame_size) + sizeof(struct skb_shared_info) <= bufsz)
+ bufsz -= sizeof(struct skb_shared_info);
skb = dev_alloc_skb(bufsz);
- else {
+ } else {
skb_trim(skb, 0);
goto map_skb;
}
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists