[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1154625289.23655.97.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 18:14:49 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Marc <linux-kernel@...uid-nexus.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sata_promise / libata defaulting to UDMA/33
Ar Gwe, 2006-08-04 am 00:31 +0800, ysgrifennodd Marc:
> Hi.
>
> I'm having great difficulty solving a problem I've encountered. I have a
> Promise Fastrak TX4000 card:
We knock things down to UDMA33 if they are on an unsuitable cable. The
rest of the displayed data looks correct.
> ata2: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xF8ABC280 ctl 0xF8ABC2B8 bmdma 0x0 irq 137
Controller does 133
> ata2: dev 0 cfg 49:2f00 82:346b 83:7f01 84:4003 85:3469 86:3c01 87:4003 88:203f
> ata2: dev 0 ATA-6, max UDMA/100, 312581808 sectors: LBA48
Devices does UDMA 100
> <b>ata2: dev 0 configured for UDMA/33</b>
So this appears to be a cable confusion. One thing that was fixed in
recent patches was a bug where if the core code decided something was
PATA but the drive setup was in fact SATA it incorrectly clipped to
UDMA33.
> I'm currently running kernel 2.6.17.3. In the controller's BIOS I've created 3
> 'stripe' arrays with 1 disk per array, the BIOS shows the 3 drives as U5 (UDMA
> mode 5 - which is UDMA/100 right?).
Correct
> I've searched high and low but haven't found an answer to this problem. Help
> appreciated. Please - I'm getting dismal performance.
I think the needed patch is in 2.6.18-mm, not sure about 2.6.18-rc base.
Jeff Garzik would be able to verify what has it merged.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists