linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.17-rt8 crash amd64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060803014154.GA3370@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Date:	Wed, 2 Aug 2006 18:41:54 -0700
From:	Bill Huey (hui) <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>
To:	Mark Knecht <markknecht@...il.com>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Bill Huey (hui)" <billh@...ppy.monkey.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.17-rt8 crash amd64

On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 06:20:50PM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On 8/1/06, hui Bill Huey <billh@...ppy.monkey.org> wrote:
> >Hello folks,
> >
> >I'm getting this:
> >
> >[   41.989355] BUG: scheduling while atomic: udevd/0x00000001/1101
> <SNIP>
> >[   42.198871]        <ffffffff8025ce3d>{error_exit+0}
> >[   42.204040]        <ffffffff8025bf22>{system_call+126}
> >[   42.209715] ---------------------------
> >[   42.213716] | preempt count: 00000001 ]
> >[   42.217715] | 1-level deep critical section nesting:
> >[   42.222879] ----------------------------------------
> >[   42.228043] .. [<ffffffff8025ef7d>] .... __schedule+0xb3/0xb2a
> >[   42.234150] .....[<ffffffff8025fd89>] ..   ( <= schedule+0xec/0x11e)
> >[   42.240796]
> >[   53.347726] NET: Registered protocol family 10
> >[   53.353240] IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling driver
> 
> Hi,
>   Similar problems here also but in my case it said '2-level deep'
> and I had different stuff after that message. AMD64/ NVidia MB. I
> don't have a second Linux machine handle to do the remote boot console
> thing. If it's important that I send in more info I'll get a camera or
> something like that. Let me know if it's required.
> 
>   Anyway, not a one machine problem at all.

Any stack trace is welcomed.

I just changed a couple of things to get a better stack trace and it's
changed the timing of the system where I can't get a reliable stack
trace anymore. Try another route...

bill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/