[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060803185958.GC11577@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 14:59:58 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@....hp.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, linville@...driver.com
Subject: Re: orinoco driver causes *lots* of lockdep spew
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 11:58:00AM -0700, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:11:53PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 11:54:41PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > this is another one of those nasty buggers;
> > >
> > > Good catch. It's really time that we fix this properly rather than
> > > adding more kludges to the core code.
> > >
> > > Dave, once this goes in you can revert the previous netlink workaround
> > > that added the _bh suffix.
> > >
> > > [WIRELESS]: Send wireless netlink events with a clean slate
> >
> > Could we please just get rid of the wireless extensions over netlink code
> > again? It doesn't help to solve anything and just creates a bigger mess
> > to untangle when switching to a fully fledged wireless stack.
>
> That's not going to happen any time soon, NetworkManager
> depends on Wireless Events, as well as many other apps. And there is
> not many mechanisms you can use in the kernel to generate events from
> driver to userspace.
It seemed to cope pretty well before we had this ?
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists