linux-kernel - Re: A proposal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:06:05 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Jack Lo <jlo@...are.com>
Subject: Re: A proposal - binary

On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 03:14:21AM -0700, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> I would like to propose an interface for linking a GPL kernel, 
> specifically, Linux, against binary blobs.

Sorry, but we aren't lawyers here, we are programmers.  Do you have a
patch that shows what you are trying to describe here?  Care to post it?

How does this differ with the way that the Xen developers are proposing?
Why haven't you worked with them to find a solution that everyone likes?

And what about Rusty's proposal that is supposed to be the "middle
ground" between the two competing camps?  How does this differ from
that?  Why don't you like Rusty's proposal?

Please, start posting code and work together with the other people that
are wanting to achive the same end goal as you are.  That is what really
matters here.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/