[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060803194410.GC16927@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 15:44:10 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: Userspace visible of 3 include/asm/ headers
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 09:39:52PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Could anyone help me regarding the desired userspace visibility of the
> following three headers under include/asm/?
>
>
> Header : cpufeature.h
> Architectures : i386, x86_64
> Is there any reason why this header is exported to userspace?
Probably not. The only apps I've seen that care about feature bits
define them theirselves rather than use these.
> Header : setup.h
> Architectures : i386, ia64, x86_64
> Contents:
> - COMMAND_LINE_SIZE on ia64, x86_64
> - much more on i386
> Should COMMAND_LINE_SIZE be visible to userspace?
Bootloaders probably need to know this.
> Header : timex.h
> Architectures : all architectures
> Offers CLOCK_TICK_RATE on all architectures, but on some architectures
> (like i386) this depends on the kernel configuration.
> -> not a userspace header?
Also longer term, CLOCK_TICK_RATE will make no sense should we go
to a tickless kernel.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists