[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84EA05E2CA77634C82730353CBE3A84307E83E88@SAUSEXMB1.amd.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 16:10:55 -0500
From: "Duran, Leo" <leo.duran@....com>
To: "Muli Ben-Yehuda" <muli@...ibm.com>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
"Jon Mason" <jdmason@...ibm.com>
cc: ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, discuss@...-64.org
Subject: IOMMU (Calgary) patches
Andi, Jon, Muli,
I'm trying to build with the latest IOMMU patches for x86_64, so, I've
pulled down 2.6.17, and the 2.6.18-rc3 patches... But, that's obviously
lagging behind a bit.
Is there a source tree that you guys work from?
(I'm hoping that there's a better mechanism than keeping track of
patches as they are submitted here).
Leo Duran.
-----Original Message-----
From: Muli Ben-Yehuda [mailto:muli@...ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 2:24 AM
To: Rolf Eike Beer
Cc: Andrew Morton; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Andi Kleen;
discuss@...-64.org
Subject: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Move valid_dma_direction() from x86_64 to
generic code
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:25:19AM +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > ./arch/x86_64/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c:6:#include <asm/dma-mapping.h>
> > ./drivers/net/fec_8xx/fec_main.c:40:#include <asm/dma-mapping.h>
> > ./drivers/net/fs_enet/fs_enet.h:11:#include <asm/dma-mapping.h>
> > ./include/asm-x86_64/swiotlb.h:5:#include <asm/dma-mapping.h>
>
> I suspect it to be a bug anyway that every of this files ever included
> asm/dma-mapping.h.
Agreed wrt the fs_enet and fec_8xx; the swiotlb stuff I dimly recall I
had a reason for. I'll take a look in bit to verify akpm's fix works.
> > ./include/linux/dma-mapping.h:27:#include <asm/dma-mapping.h>
>
> This is perfectly valid, isn't it :)
:-)
Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists