[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060803215230.GI25692@stusta.de>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 23:52:31 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Userspace visible of 3 include/asm/ headers
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 02:28:43PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
> >
> > > Header : setup.h
> > > Architectures : i386, ia64, x86_64
> > > Contents:
> > > - COMMAND_LINE_SIZE on ia64, x86_64
> > > - much more on i386
> > > Should COMMAND_LINE_SIZE be visible to userspace?
> >
> >Bootloaders probably need to know this.
> >
>
> COMMAND_LINE_SIZE should be moved to a different header and be made
> common between all architectures.
On different architectures, we have the following values for
COMMAND_LINE_SIZE:
- 256
- 512
- 896
- 1024
- 4096
What should be the common value?
4096?
And I have a rough memory of some dependencies of COMMAND_LINE_SIZE and
boot loaders. What exactly must be taken care of when increasing
COMMAND_LINE_SIZE?
> -hpa
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists