[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060803234918.7ae8d9e1.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 23:49:18 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: dipankar@...ibm.com
Cc: pj@....com, vatsa@...ibm.com, mingo@...e.hu,
nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, sam@...ain.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvz.org, efault@....de,
balbir@...ibm.com, sekharan@...ibm.com, nagar@...son.ibm.com,
haveblue@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu
controller
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:07:38 +0530
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 11:31:13PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> > Dipankar wrote:
> > > f-series infrastructure
> >
> > Do you have a good link to follow for more on this?
> >
>
> Here is the link to the last posting of the series by Chandra -
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/4/27/378
>
Right, thanks. Look at the diffstats there.
This:
init/main.c | 2 +
kernel/exit.c | 2 +
kernel/fork.c | 2 +
fs/proc/base.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/sched.h | 4 +
is the *entire* impact on existing kernel code. Sweet.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists