[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1154685646.23655.185.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 11:00:46 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Karsten Keil <kkeil@...e.de>
Cc: Jukka Partanen <jspartanen@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.4.32] Fix AVM C4 ISDN card init problems with newer
CPUs
Ar Iau, 2006-08-03 am 19:31 +0200, ysgrifennodd Karsten Keil:
> Yes, that should be go in.
>
> AVM C4 ISDN NIC: Add three memory barriers, taken from 2.6.7,
> (they are there in 2.6.17.7 too), to fix module initialization
> problems appearing with at least some newer Celerons and
> Pentium III.
>
> Acked-by: Karsten Keil <kkeil@...e.de>
> Signed-off-by: Jukka Partanen <jspartanen@...il.com>
NAK: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
Two reasons
#1 You should use cpu_relax in such loops
#2 The readl (which c4inmeml is a pointless #define of) is defined to be
a volatile reference itself
That means that the real bug would appear to be different and either you
have a gcc bug which is possible or you have something stranger going
on, such as the continued polling busying the microcontroller the other
end, in which case you need a delay not the lucky chance that mb() is
slowish on some x86 systems.
So you either want
cpu_relax + other fixes
or udelay(something)
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists