| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:14:47 -0400 From: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com> To: alessandro salvatori <sandr8@...il.com> Cc: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 10/19] UML - Remove spinlock wrapper functions On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 01:00:43PM +0000, alessandro salvatori wrote: > the new lock irq_lock is still static, but we now have preprocessor > macros to be included from a header file instead of non-static functions in > the same module as the static irq_lock. I don't understand. The changes in this patch are - remove two functions and their declarations replace calls to those functions with spin_lock_irq_save and spin_unlock_irqsave move the spinlock declaration above the spin_(un)lock_irq_save calls Which of these are you talking about? Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists