[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060804010550.GA12085@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:05:50 +1000
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, davej@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, linville@...driver.com, jt@....hp.com
Subject: Re: orinoco driver causes *lots* of lockdep spew
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 08:22:58AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> however I'm not quite yet convinced that this patch is going to solve
> this particular deadlock.
> (I agree with the principle of it and I think it's really needed,
> I just don't yet see how it's going to solve this specific deadlock. But
> then again it's early and I've not had sufficient coffee yet so I could
> well be wrong)
Well it solves the dead lock by breaking the chain that links the
netlink system with the jungle of wireless locking :)
The spin lock in sk_buff_head acts as a mediator. We only feed the
skb to the netlink system once that spin lock has been dropped.
> it's not just about irq context, it's about being called with any lock
> that's
> used in IRQ context; that is what makes this double nasty...
Yes it is nasty. However, so far wireless seems to be the only offender.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists