[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060804220644.GA28344@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:06:44 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: single bit flip detector.
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:19:55PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2006 20:16:26 -0400
> Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > In case where we detect a single bit has been flipped, we spew
> > the usual slab corruption message, which users instantly think
> > is a kernel bug. In a lot of cases, single bit errors are
> > down to bad memory, or other hardware failure.
> >
> > This patch adds an extra line to the slab debug messages
> > in those cases, in the hope that users will try memtest before
> > they report a bug.
>
> Well boy, this has to be the most-reviewed patch ever. You'd think that
> I'd apply it with great confidence and warm fuzzies.
I should stick to one-liner fixes.
> - one decl per line is more patching-friendly and a bit more idiomatic.
> - make `bad_count' an int: a uchar might overflow
> - Put a blank line between decls and code
> - rename `total' to `error', remove `errors'.
> - there's no need to sum up the errors.
> - don't need to check for non-zero `errors': we know it is != POISON_FREE.
> - make it look non-crapful in an 80-col window.
> - add missing spaces in arithmetic
With this much iteration, I do have one question..
Does it still work ? :-)
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists