[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200608050052.36535.ak@suse.de>
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 00:52:36 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Jack Lo <jlo@...are.com>, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, James.Bottomley@...eleye.com,
pazke@...pac.ru
Subject: Re: A proposal - binary
> For privileged domains that have hardware privileges and need to send
> IPIs or something it might make sense.
Any SMP guest needs IPI support of some sort.
But it is hopefully independent of subarchitectures in the paravirtualized
case.
> doesn't stop Linux from using the provided primitives in any way is
> sees fit. So it doesn't top evolution in that sense. What it does stop
> is having the Linux hypervisor interface grow antlers and have new
> hooves grafted onto it. What it sorely needed in the interface is a way
> to probe
That's the direction the interface is evolving I think (see multiple
entry point discussion)
> and detect optional features that allow it to grow independent
> of one particular hypervisor vendor.
Ok maybe not with options and subsets so far, but one has to
start somewhere.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists