[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20060804.163549.106287275.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 16:35:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc: esandeen@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix sun partition overflow over 1T
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 17:56:30 +0100
> Ar Gwe, 2006-08-04 am 11:22 -0500, ysgrifennodd Eric Sandeen:
> > Although sun partition labels aren't supposed to support > 1T, apparently
> > linux partition editors will allow up to 2T. This can cause problems
> > in the kernel when these larger partitions are read, due to a signed
> > int container.
> >
> > num_sectors in the sun_disklabel struct is marked as __u32 in 2.4, and
> > as __be32 in 2.6. However, this is assigned to a signed int in
> > sun_partition():
> >
> > int num_sectors;
> >
> > st_sector = be32_to_cpu(p->start_cylinder) * spc;
> > num_sectors = be32_to_cpu(p->num_sectors);
> >
> > Changing num_sectors to an unsigned int avoids this problem.
> >
>
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@...hat.com>
>
> Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>
Applied, thanks a lot.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists