lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060804032348.GA16313@thunk.org>
Date:	Thu, 3 Aug 2006 23:23:49 -0400
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To:	Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt DO NOT APPLY] Fix for tg3 networking lockup

On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 04:28:19PM -0700, Michael Chan wrote:
> True.  But they also have ASF enabled which requires tg3_timer() to send
> the heartbeat periodically.  If the heartbeat is late, ASF may reset the
> chip believing that the system has crashed.

Parden me for asking a dumb question, but what's being accomplished by
resetting the chip if the system has crashed?  Why not reset the chip
when the system reboots and it sees the PCI bus reset?  I guess I'm
missing the purpose of the ASF heartbeat; why does the networking chip
need a chip-specific watchdog?

						- Ted
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ