| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2006 13:47:26 +0200 From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@...oo.it> To: user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, sandr8@...il.com Cc: "Jeff Dike" <jdike@...toit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 10/19] UML - Remove spinlock wrapper functions On Friday 04 August 2006 15:00, alessandro salvatori wrote: > Jeff, > > the new lock irq_lock is still static, but we now have preprocessor > macros to be included from a header file Are you talking about spin_lock_irqsave & co? In that case you have maybe missed that the removed functions were simply wrappers for spin_lock_irqsave. Those wrappers existed to be used in files which can't include kernel headers (long story). > instead of non-static functions in > the same module as the static irq_lock. > Am I missing something? -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists