linux-kernel - Re: e100: checksum mismatch on 82551ER rev10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <62b0912f0608050628v78dcc5c2k75970d6d32f90748@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 5 Aug 2006 15:28:40 +0200
From:	"Molle Bestefich" <molle.bestefich@...il.com>
To:	"David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com, charlieb@...ge.apana.org.au,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: e100: checksum mismatch on 82551ER rev10

David Miller wrote:
> Please put the option into the e100 driver to allow trying to use the
> device even if the EEPROM checksum is wrong.

Whee, the users win! :-)

> If an Intel developer doesn't do it, I will.

I hope you don't piss off the nice guys at Intel who contribute source
code to the Linux kernel so much that they go away.

For what it's worth, a redistributable utility to fix the EEPROM
checksum would be just as fine a solution (for me)...  if only one was
available.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/