linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Turn rdmsr, rdtsc into inline functions, clarify names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 6 Aug 2006 04:38:24 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
To:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc:	lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Turn rdmsr, rdtsc into inline functions, clarify names

On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 07:47:41PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> [Andi, sorry, x86_64 part untested, so sending straight to you]
> 
> rdmsr and rdtsc are macros, altering their arguments directly.  An
> inline function would offer decent typechecking, but needs to take
> pointer args.  The comment notes that gcc produces better code with

I think I prefer the macro variant actually. Sorry. It just looks
better without the &s.

We don't care very much about the code quality here because
rdmsr/wrmsr are always very slow in microcode anyways and tend
to synchronize the CPUs.

If you feel a need to clean up I would suggest you convert more
users over to the ll variants which take a single 64bit value
instead of two 32bit ones.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/