linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:31:00 +0200
From:	Jes Sorensen <jes@....com>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc:	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean

Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> We know that today long is the only one that differs
> 
> For "modern architectures" maybe, but older compilers (like Turbo C 
> compiler (1990)), int is a 16 bit quantity, and therefore does differ, from 
> today's implementations at least.

Excuse me, but this conversation was about compiling the Linux kernel.
What non GCC compilers do is irrelevant to this.

Jes
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/