[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20060807012638.GA42404@muc.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 03:26:38 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
davej@...hat.com, torvalds@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.18-rc3-g3b445eea BUG: warning at /usr/src/linux-git/kernel/cpu.c:51/unlock_cpu_hotplug()
> > [<c0171577>] vfs_write+0xcd/0x179
> > [<c0171c20>] sys_write+0x3b/0x71
> > [<c010318d>] sysenter_past_esp+0x56/0x8d
> This "unwinder stuck" thing seems to be very common.
Yes, there are still a lot of bugs in the unwind annotation
unfortunately.
We're also slowly discovering that some things we do cannot
even be expressed in CFI, so some code has to change.
>
> It's a false-positive in this case - the backtrace was complete. It would
> be good if we could make the did-we-get-stuck detector a bit smarter. Even
> special-casing "sysenter_past_esp" would stop a lot of this..
Actually it's not completely false in this case -- it should
have reached user mode and stopped there, but for some reason
I didn't and already stopped still in the kernel.
Most likely the CFI annotation for that sysenter path is not complete.
It's on my todo list to investigate but I still hope Jan does it first ;-)
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists