linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Aug 2006 13:45:20 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Albert Cahalan" <acahalan@...il.com>
Cc:	froese@....de, B.Steinbrink@....de, hurtta+gmane@...lo.fmi.fi,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls

Hi,

Edgar Toernig writes:
> > Urgs, so any user may remove mappings from another process and
> > let it crash?

On 7/22/06, Albert Cahalan <acahalan@...il.com> wrote:
> Two good solutions come to mind:
>
> a. substitute the zero page
> b. make the mapping private and touch it as if C-O-W happened

Actually, I think revokeat() and frevoke() should be consistent with
mmap which will make a process go SIGBUS if it attempts to write to
truncated shared mapping.

                                          Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/