linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Turn rdmsr, rdtsc into inline functions, clarify names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Aug 2006 13:09:31 +0200
From:	Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...ightbb.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Turn rdmsr, rdtsc into inline functions, clarify names

On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:48:50AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 10:43:44PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 August 2006 23:16, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > This whole thing is broken, e.g. on a preemptive kernel when the
> > > code can switch CPUs 
> > > 
> > 
> > Would not preempt_disable fix that?
> 
> Partially, but you still have other problems. Please just get rid
> of it. Why do we have timer code in the kernel if you then chose
> not to use it?
 
The problem is that gettimeofday() is not always fast. The joystick
drivers will not work if the timing calls take significant time compared
to an inb() from ISA/LPC space.

That's why they don't fallback to PIT timing when TSC is not available -
io counting is a better option.

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
Director SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/