[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200608071655.36216.ak@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 16:55:36 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Cc: anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: notify_page_fault_chain
On Monday 07 August 2006 16:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> I consider it already questionable to split out a specific
> >> fault from the general die notification (previous users of the functionality all of the sudden won't get
> notifications
> >> for one of the most crucial faults anymore), but entirely hiding the functionality (unavailable without
> CONFIG_KPROBES,
> >> and even with it not getting exported) is really odd.
> >
> >You want to use it for your debugger?
>
> Yes, in its "light" form (i.e. without exception handling framework changes) it has to rely on this infrastructure.
Ok. I can make it unconditional and export it.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists