linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Turn rdmsr, rdtsc into inline functions, clarify names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:22:19 +0200
From:	Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	Andreas Mohr <andi@...x01.fht-esslingen.de>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...ightbb.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Turn rdmsr, rdtsc into inline functions, clarify names

On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 06:12:03PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 05:57:14PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > That way a driver could use
> > > > 
> > > > 	if (gtod_cpu_cycles_needed <= 500)
> > > > 		gettimeofday();
> > > > 	else
> > > > 		funky_fast_workaround();
> > > 
> > > Sounds like overengineering to me. I prefer something simple.
> > 
> > I could as well benchmark gettimeofday() in the gameport init.
> 
> Except you can't because the only way to benchmark it would
> be to use gettimeofday already and then you don't know
> how much is overhead and what is the real time.
 
I run it for 1/10th of a second in a loop and see how many iterations
I've done.  That's enough to check if its fast enough to use in the
gameport routine. Less than 50k iterations and I can't use it.

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
Director SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/