linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86 paravirt_ops: create no

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Aug 2006 08:17:42 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
To:	virtualization@...ts.osdl.org
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86 paravirt_ops: create no_paravirt.h for native ops

On Monday 07 August 2006 08:04, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 07:30 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/include/asm-i386/no_paravirt.h
> > 
> > I can't say I like the name. After all that should be the normal
> > case for a long time now ... native? normal? bareiron?
> 
> Yeah, I don't like it much either.  native.h doesn't say what the
> alternative is.  native_paravirt.h is kind of contradictory.

You could create a subdirectory?

> I'm just shuffling code here, and if the other approach works, I won't
> even be doing that.

If you move it you can as well clean it up.  The result would be likely
at least 50% shorter.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/