linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86 paravirt_ops: create no

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20060807062705.GB4979@rhun.haifa.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 7 Aug 2006 09:27:05 +0300
From:	Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
Cc:	virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86 paravirt_ops: create no_paravirt.h for native ops

> On Monday 07 August 2006 08:04, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 07:30 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > ===================================================================
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/include/asm-i386/no_paravirt.h
> > > 
> > > I can't say I like the name. After all that should be the normal
> > > case for a long time now ... native? normal? bareiron?
> > 
> > Yeah, I don't like it much either.  native.h doesn't say what the
> > alternative is.  native_paravirt.h is kind of contradictory.

baremetal.h seems appropriate.

Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/