linux-kernel - Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <44D6E98C.9090208@sw.ru>
Date:	Mon, 07 Aug 2006 11:19:40 +0400
From:	Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
To:	rohitseth@...gle.com
CC:	vatsa@...ibm.com, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
	nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, sam@...ain.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvz.org, efault@....de,
	balbir@...ibm.com, sekharan@...ibm.com, nagar@...son.ibm.com,
	haveblue@...ibm.com, pj@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A	cpu
 controller

>>>Doesnt the ability to move tasks between groups dynamically affect
>>>(atleast) memory controller design (in giving up ownership etc)?
>>
>>we save object owner on the object. So if you change the container,
>>objects are still correctly charged to the creator and are uncharged
>>correctly on free.
>>
> 
> 
> Seems like the object owner should also change when the object moves
> from one container to another.
Consider a file which is opened in 2 processes. one of the processes
wants to move to another container then. How would you decide whether
to change the file owner or not?

Kirill

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/