| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 11:25:46 +0400 From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru> To: Martin Bligh <mbligh@...igh.org> CC: vatsa@...ibm.com, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, mingo@...e.hu, nickpiggin@...oo.com.au, sam@...ain.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvz.org, efault@....de, balbir@...ibm.com, sekharan@...ibm.com, nagar@...son.ibm.com, haveblue@...ibm.com, pj@....com Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/5] Going forward with Resource Management - A cpu controller >> OpenVZ assumes that tasks can't move between task-groups for a single >> reason: >> user shouldn't be able to escape from the container. >> But this have no implication on the design/implementation. > > > It does, for the memory controller at least. Things like shared > anon_vma's between tasks across containers make it somewhat harder. > It's much worse if you allow threads to split across containers. we already have the code to account page fractions shared between containers. Though, it is quite useless to do so for threads... Since this numbers have no meaning (not a real usage) and only the sum of it will be a correct value. >> BTW, do you see any practical use cases for tasks jumping between >> resource-containers? > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists