[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200608071011.31473.ak@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 10:11:31 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Cc: "Chuck Ebbert" <76306.1226@...puserve.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] i386: fix stuck unwind into kernel thread
On Monday 07 August 2006 10:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@...puserve.com> 06.08.06 20:56 >>>
> >We cannot unwind past kernel_thread_helper.
>
> Just as mentioned before - we shouldn't add endless special cases to the code that interprets the unwind
> information, but rather fix the unwind information so that it properly reflect the actual state. Like in the
> other case, the piece of code should be properly annotated, which would require it to be moved into
> an assembly file (it escapes me why code like that was ever placed in a C file).
I can do that.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists