[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 04:00:21 -0500
From: Jeffrey Hundstad <jeffrey.hundstad@...u.edu>
To: Nathan Scott <nathans@....com>
Cc: Manuel Reimer <Manuel.Spam@...fuerspam.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is XFS trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16
Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:34:48AM +0200, Manuel Reimer wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> could someone please tell me if XFS is trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16?
>> There have been some bugs:
>>
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6380
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6757
>>
>
> These are the same problem. 2.6.16 is unaffected.
>
>
>> want a stable kernel and 2.6.16 seems to fit all my needs.
>>
>
> For XFS, its goodness. 2.6.18 will be good too, and 2.6.17.7+.
>
> cheers.
>
>
If you have run 2.6.17 to 2.6.17.6 or early 2.6.18-rc? however; please
run a xfs_repair v.2.6.10; because the corruption may/will have already
taken place and a silent time bomb may be waiting. Three machines
already died with symptom of the corruption on kernels that no longer
have the problem.
--
Jeffrey Hundstad
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists