[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:41:59 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
"Protasevich, Natalie" <Natalie.Protasevich@...sys.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Make NR_IRQS configurable in Kconfig
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 04:17:59 +0200
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
>
> >
> > And it's a pretty nasty one because it can get people into the situation
> > where the kernel worked fine for those who released it, but users who
> > happen to load more modules (or the right combination of them) will
> > experience per-cpu memory exhaustion.
>
> Yes, and a high value will waste a lot of memory for normal users.
>
> > So shouldn't we being scaling the per-cpu memory as well?
>
> If we move it into vmalloc space it would be easy to extend at runtime - just the
> virtual address space would need to be prereserved, but then more pages
> could be mapped. Maybe we should just do that instead of continuing to kludge around?
Sounds sane.
otoh, we need something for 2.6.19.
> Drawback would be some more TLB misses.
yup. On some (important) architectures - I'm not sure which architectures
do the bigpage-for-kernel trick.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists