[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:15:38 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Chase Venters <chase.venters@...entec.com>
Cc: Edgar Toernig <froese@....de>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, tytso@....edu, tigran@...itas.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
Ar Llu, 2006-08-07 am 17:24 -0500, ysgrifennodd Chase Venters:
> implementation is crude. "EBADF" is not something that applications are
> taught to expect. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I can think of no
> situation under which a file descriptor currently gets yanked out from
> under your feet -- you should always have to formally abandon it with
> close().
The file descriptor is not pulled from under you, the access to it is.
This is exactly what occurs today when a tty is hung up. That could be
almost any fd because paths could be symlinks to a pty/tty pair...
In the tty case you get -ENXIO
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists