| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:03:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Paolo Giarrusso <blaisorblade@...oo.it> To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] uml: use -mcmodel=kernel for x86_64 Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> ha scritto: > Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@...oo.it> writes: > > > From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@...oo.it> > > > > We have never used this flag and recently one user experienced a > complaining > > warning about this (there was a symbol in the positive half of > the address space > > IIRC). So fix it. > > You can't use kernel cmodel in user space. It requires running on > negative > virtual addresses. I would be surprised if it worked for you. Argh, yes, I didn't test the patch and I didn't think to it a lot. So what about the following bug? Should we hack our own module loader based on x86-64's one? Moreover, who has recently tested module loading in x86-64 uml kernels? I don't remember doing such testing recently... http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=user-mode-linux-devel&m=115125101012707&w=2 Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists